Association Between Psychological Profile And Academic Achievement of Midwifery Students

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rahmatul Ulya
Arni Amir
Yaslinda Yaunin

Abstract

One way to reduce MMR and IMR is to improve the quality of graduates of midwifery education. The development of students' abilities can be evaluated by seeing the results or learning achievements. Psychological tests will help midwifery education institutions to find out the background, motivation and other environments related to students. This research is a quantitative research design with a cross sectional design to determine the association between psychological profiles with the academic achievement of midwifery students. The study was conducted in November - December 2017 at the West Sumatra Midwifery Academy. The population in this study were all 2nd grade students totaling 40 people. Statistical analysis was conducted using chi square analysis. The results of this study were: 70.0% of the subjects structure of intelligence were in the sufficient category, 62.5% of the subjects work behavior were in the sufficient category, 72.5% of the subjects sociability were in the sufficient category, 50.0% of subjects leadership were in the less category, 47, 5% of the subjects temprament and emotion were in the sufficient category, 60.0% of the subjects grade point average (GPA) is sufficient. There was a significant relationship between the structure of intelligence, work behavior, type of personality, sociability, leadership, temperament and emotions with the academic achievement of midwifery students.

 

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Anastasi, A. Urbina. (2007). Tes Psikologi. Jakarta: Index
  2. Austin, EJ. Evans, P. Goldwater, R. Goldwater. Potter, VP. (2005). A Preliminary study of Emotional Intelligence, Emphaty and Exam Performance in first year Medical student. Personality and Individual Diferences Volume 39 pp 1395-1405
  3. Busato,VV. Prinsb, FJ. Elshouta, J. Hamakera, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students. Personality and Individual Diferences Volume 29 No.6 pp 1057-1068
  4. Cemani DP, Soebroto AA, Wicaksono SA. (2012). Sistem Pakar Tes Kepribadian Papi Kostick Untuk Seleksi dan Penempatan Tenaga. Universitas Brawijaya
  5. Deary, I. Strand, S. Smith, P. Fernandes, C. (2006). Intelligence and Educational achievement. Intelligence Volume 35 No.1 pp 13-21
  6. Dewi ER, Puriastuti AC. (2016). Refleksi Pendidikan: Peranan tes psikologi sebagai strategi sukses seleksi peserta didik pendidikan kebidanan. Surabaya: Fakultas kedokteran Universitas Airlangga
  7. Goleman, Daniel. 2000. Emotional Intelligence (terjemahan). Jakata : PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  8. Goleman, Daniel. 2000. Working With Emotional Intelligence (terjemahan). Jakarta : PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  9. Goleman, Daniel.2001.Kecerdasan Emosional untuk Mencapai Puncak Prestasi (terjemahkan oleh Widodo). Jakarta: PT. Gramedia
  10. Hosnan. (2016). Psikologi Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia
  11. Indrawati. (2012). Assesmen Psikologi. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  12. Jufri, M. (1999). Efikasi Diri, Keterampilan Belajar dan Penyesuaian diri sebagai Prediktor Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa Tahun I. Yogyakarta: Tesis (Tidak diterbitkan). Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gajah Mada
  13. Manuaba. (2008). Pengantar Kuliah Obstetri. Jakarta: EGC
  14. Peraturan Menkes RI Nomor 900/Menkes ISK/VII/2002 tentang Registrasi dan Praktek Bidan
  15. Pusat Bahasa Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2002). Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka
  16. Psychologymania. (2012). Tes PAPI Kostick (Perseptual and Preferences InventoryTest).
  17. Robbin, SP. Judge. 2008. Perilakuy Organisasi. Buku 2, Jakarta : Salemba Empat
  18. Saifudin, A .(2002). Sikap Manusia: Teori dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
  19. Saifuddin, AB. (2006). Buku Panduan Praktis Pelayanan Kesehatan Maternal dan Neonatal. Jakarta: Yayasan Bina Pustaka.
  20. Saparinah, S (editor), (1986). Inteligensi, Bakat, dan Tes IQ. Cetakan Pertama. Jakarta: GayaFavorit Press
  21. Schunk, D. (2012). Learning Theories An Educational Perspective, Sixth Edition. Pearson Education
  22. Shaleh, AR. (2004). Psikologi SuatuPengantar Dalam Perspektif Islam. Jakarta: PT. Prenada media
  23. Subekti, R . Firman, H.(1989). Evaluasi hasil belajar dan pengajaran remedial. Jakarta: UT
  24. Sudjana,N. Ibrahim. (2001). Penelitian dan penilaian pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar baru algensindo
  25. Sukardi, DK. Kusmawati, DEPN. (2009). Analisis Tes Psikologis Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
  26. Suryabrata, S. (1990). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: CV. Rajawali
  27. Trihandini, R.A.F.M. (2005). Analisis Pengaruh Kecerdasan Intelektual, Kecerdasan Emosi, dan Kecerdasan Spiritual Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan (Studi Kasus di Hotel Horison Semarang). Tesis Program Pascasarjana Magister Manajemen Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
  28. Tirandha, Octa. 2017. Hubungan antara Analisis Sikap Kerja dan Indeks Prestasi Kumulatif pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Dokter FK. Jurnal Cerebellum Vol 3 No. 2 World Health Organization. (2014)
  29. William, R. Joshua, W. (2009). How Important is the General Factor Of Personality? A General Critique. Northwestern University
  30. Zucker, S. (2003). Fundamentals of standardized testing. Harcourt Assessment Report, Harcourt Assessment, Inc.