Fetus Cardiovasculler

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jul 30, 2022
https://doi.org/10.25077/jom.7.1.24-34.2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Vol. 7 No. 1 (2022): Published on June 2022

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Yusrawati yusrawati
Section Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine Andalas University, Padang
Muhammad Iqbal
Section Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine Andalas University, Padang
Reyhan Julio azwan
Departement of obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Andalas of University, Indonesia
Bobby Indra Utama
Departement of obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Andalas of University, Indonesia
Joserizal Serudji
Departement of obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Andalas of University, Indonesia
Hudila rifa karmia
Departement of obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Andalas of University, Indonesia

Abstract

Formation of the human heart involves complex biological signals, interactions, specification of myocardial progenitorcells, and heart tube looping. To facilitate survival in the hy poxemic intrauterine environment, the fetus possessesstructural, physiological, and functional cardiovascular adaptations that are fundamentally different from the neonate. The  fetal  circulation is considered to anatomical and biochemical changes in the cardiovascular system. This review article describes key cardiac progenitors involved in embryonic heart development; the cellular, physiological, and anatomical changes during the transition from fetal to neonatal circulation.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

  1. Armstrong MT, Lee DY, Armstrong PB. Regulation of proliferation of the fetal myocardium. Dev Dyn. 2000 Oct;219(2): 226–36.
  2. Artman M, Mahony L, Teitel DF. Neonatal cardiology: McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub. Di- vision; 2002.
  3. Auman HJ, Coleman H, Riley HE, Olale F, Tsai HJ, Yelon D. Functional modulation of cardiac form through regionally confined cell shape changes. PLoS Biol. 2007 Mar; 5(3):e53.
  4. Birch PK, Hoffman E, Larsen CR, Nielsen HS. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies. Fertil Steril 2016;105:958-67.
  5. Blackburn S. Maternal, Fetal, & Neonatal Physiology-E-Book: Elsevier Health Scienc- es; 2014.
  6. Calì G, Timor-Tritsch IE, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Monteaugudo A, Buca D, F Forlani F, et al. Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and metaanalysis.
  7. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018:169-75.
  8. Christoffels VM, Smits GJ, Kispert A, Moor- man AF. Development of the pacemaker tis- sues of the heart. Circ Res. 2010 Feb;106(2): 240–54.17. Hatcher CJ, Basson CT. Specification of the cardiac conduction system by transcription factors. Circ Res. 2009 Sep;105(7):620–30.18. Rana MS, Christoffels VM, Moorman AF. A molecular and genetic outline of cardiac morphogenesis. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2013 Apr;207(4):588–615.
  9. Edelstone DI, Rudolph AM, Heymann MA. Liver and ductus venosus blood flows in fetal lambs in utero. Circ Res. 1978 Mar;42(3): 426–33.
  10. Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2002;57:537-43.
  11. Gao L, Huang Z, Zhang X, Zhou N, Huang X, Wang X. Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy - a case series and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;200:102-7.
  12. Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Bartelings MM, Poelmann RE, Haak MC, Jongbloed MR. Embryology of the heart and its impact on understanding fetal and neonatal heart dis-ease. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Oct; 18(5):237–44.
  13. Gittenberger-de Groot AC, Calkoen EE, Poelmann RE, Bartelings MM, Jongbloed MR. Morphogenesis and molecular consid- erations on congenital cardiac septal defects. Ann Med. 2014 Dec;46(8):640–52.
  14. Gonzalez N, Tulandi T. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017;24:731-8.
  15. Grechukhina O, Deshmukh U, Fan L, Kohari K, Abdel-Razeq S, Bahtiyar MO, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy, incidence, and recurrence: five-year experience at a single tertiary care
  16. referral center. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:1285-95.
  17. Gupta A, Paria A. Transition from fetus to neonate. Surgery. 2016;34(12):593–6.
  18. Harb HM, Knight M, Bottomley C, Overton C, Tobias A, Gallos ID, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy in the UK: a national cohort study. BJOG 2018;125:1663-70.
  19. Hasten E, McDonald-McGinn DM, Crow- ley TB, Zackai E, Emanuel BS, Morrow BE, et al. Dysregulation of TBX1 dosage in the anterior heart field results in congenital heart disease resembling the 22q11.2 dupli- cation syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2018 Jun;27(11):1847–57.